Christ’s Right to David’s Throne.

From Messiah in both Testaments.

Here is an intricate, involved puzzle: so involved it will take a little concentration on the part of the reader to follow the problem and its solution—but it will well repay the effort.

Christ, the Seed of David, must be Virgin-born and yet have a legal right to the throne of David despite the fact that one of Solomon’s descendants was a certain evil man named Jeconiah of whom it was written that none of his descendants would ever rule in Judah (see Jerem. 22:29-30); and despite the fact that in Israel the right to the throne was transmitted only through the male line: and here Christ was born of a virgin! It is perfectly clear that Messiah will inherit “the throne of David” (Isa. 9:7; Jerem. 33:15-17; 25:5; Ps. 132 :11; 1 Chron.17:11,14).

But, since He had to be born of a virgin, how can He get His legal right to the throne of David? And how can the roadblock erected by Jeconiah’s sin be circumvented? Who can untangle these apparently hopelessly confused predictions? Leave it to the Master Mind who both devised the strange prophecies and worked out their fulfillment. Remember, the prophet Isaiah said, “The zeal of the Lord of Hosts shall perform this” (Isa. 9:7).

Not only was the apparently impossible solved and resolved in JESUS THE CHRIST, but God has given us the complete record of how He did it in the genealogies of the New Testament. In Matthew’s genealogy the genealogy of Christ through Joseph is given. This genealogy shows Christ to be “the son of David”—so giving Him right to David’s throne —and also “the son of Abraham”—so giving Him right to the Land of Promise, the territorial possessions given to Abraham and his seed.

In Matthew’s genealogy, Joseph is seen to be in the REGAL line of descent from king David, down through Solomon. But Joseph was also a descendant of David through Jeconiah (also called Coniah)—hence, succession to the throne for Joseph personally is barred.

Matthew’s genealogical record is careful to show that Jesus was NOT, through Joseph, the “fruit of David’s body,” i. e., a direct descendant of David through Joseph. In Luke 3:23-38 Christ’s genealogy is given through Mary. (Heli was obviously Mary’s father, Joseph’s father-in-law, v.23).30 In the record Christ is shown to be the LITERAL “fruit of David’s body” through His mother Mary. But, and this is important: while Mary was in A ROYAL line from David, she was not in THE REGAL lineage, for she was a descendant of king David through Nathan, whereas the throne rights were to come through Solomon’s line (see 1 Chron. 28:5-6). Therefore, Joseph’s marriage to Mary before Christ was born was an absolute necessity—and that is exactly what happened!

“Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Spirit. . . . And behold the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou SON OF DAVID, fear not to take unto thee Mary THY WIFE: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 1:18-20).31

So, through Mary, Jesus the Christ obtained His literal descent from King David; and from Mary’s marriage to Joseph, who was also a “son of David.” He obtained His legal right to David’s throne, for Mary was Joseph’s wife before Jesus was born, so making Joseph Jesus’ legal father; His foster father. And, withal, the prophecy concerning Jeconiah was fulfilled too, for Jesus the Christ is NOT the “seed”—a direct descendant— of Jeconiah. Can you think of anything more intricate and involved, and yet worked out with such precision?

Joseph and Mary had to be the parents (foster father and mother) of Jesus the Christ: they were the only two people of that generation who could be, and fulfill prophecy about Messiah. And Joseph had to be married to Mary before Jesus was born, so He could get His legal right to David’s throne through Joseph. At the same time, Christ could not be a child of Joseph because of the bar against a descendant of Jeconiah. And though Joseph had to be married to Mary, yet Joseph could not “know” Mary as his wife until after Jesus was born, for He had to be born of a virgin! And the Divinely ordered fulfillment was perfect in every detail!

 

WYLAT

View Comments

    • Yes, and they were the ONLY two people on the face of the earth to perform it. I came across this years ago. It shows how God has ALL the little details sorted out.

  • "God is a master Weaver" is a metaphor used to describe God's ability to intricately weave together the events of people's lives, both joyful and sorrowful, into a beautiful and meaningful tapestry, implying that even when we don't understand the bigger picture, God is working behind the scenes with a grand design in mind; essentially, that He takes seemingly disparate threads of our lives and creates a unified, purposeful whole.

    Key points about this metaphor:
    Intricate weaving:
    Just as a skilled weaver carefully interlaces threads to create a complex pattern, God carefully orchestrates the details of our lives.

    Hidden beauty:
    We may not always see the full beauty of the tapestry while it's being woven, but ultimately, God's plan will reveal a magnificent
    design.

    Using all threads:
    Even the difficult experiences ("dark threads") are part of God's plan and contribute to the overall beauty.

    https://www.davedeselmministries.org/devotionals/the-master-weaver

  • Throne rights were to come only through Solomon only if he met the conditions in 1 Chron. 28:7 NIV - I will establish his kingdom forever if he is unswerving in carrying out my commands and laws, as is being done at this time. Solomon didn’t meet those conditions so descendants of Nathan would also have throne rights.

    • According to the Bible, no, descendants of Nathan would not have had the right to David's throne based on the traditional understanding of inheritance, as the throne was typically passed down through Solomon, David's designated heir, not Nathan; however, some interpretations, particularly in relation to Jesus' lineage, argue that Nathan's line could be considered as having a claim due to their Davidic ancestry, especially when considering the "curse of Jeconiah" which affected Solomon's direct lineage.

      Key points to consider:
      Solomon as heir: In the Bible, David explicitly chose Solomon as his successor, establishing the line of kings through him.
      Nathan's lineage: While Nathan was David's son, he was not chosen to inherit the throne.

      Jesus' genealogy: The Gospel of Luke presents Jesus' lineage through Nathan, suggesting a connection to David's line even if not through the direct line of kingship.

      • If David’s choosing Solomon to be king meant all kings had to be descendants of Solomon, then why the conditions in 1 Chron 28:7?

          • Here’s the answer. Solomon’s lasting kingdom was conditional. Solomon did not keep the conditions so his kingdom could not be unending. Therefore, Jesus could not be a descendant of Solomon because that would have made Solomon’s kingdom unending.

Share
Published by
WYLAT

Recent Posts

California Supreme Court rejects appeal from Christian baker who refused to make gay wedding cake

By Michael Gryboski The California Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal in a case…

13 hours ago

Make Abortion Laws Consistent With Homicide Laws

Roe v. Wade is dead. This is the first year in nearly half a century…

13 hours ago

6 ways pastors can lead to a more Gospel-focused church culture

By Jay Lowder A pastor recently called me seeking advice on how to create a culture…

2 days ago

Why Is What You Believe True?

A man asks why what Charlie Kirk believes about God is true and his response. …

2 days ago

We have five days left on CAC

Seeing that we only have five days left here on CAC I just want to…

2 days ago

Why Biden’s Autopen Scandal Changes Everything

https://youtu.be/asnq3eordPA Was Joe Biden the first deep state-appointed president of the United States? According to the…

3 days ago