by 
Tens of thousands of protesters swarmed the streets of Japan over the weekend to stand against the World Health Organization’s pandemic treaty and health authority overreach, with speakers criticizing the medical establishment’s experimental COVID mRNA vaccines and ties between global health authorities and pharmaceutical agendas.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
Over the weekend, tens of thousands of demonstrators took to the streets across Japan, from Ikebukuro to Higashi-Ikebukuro Central Park, to protest against the World Health Organization’s (WHO) proposed pandemic treaty. The protests, captured in videos showing significant peaceful gatherings, voiced concerns over global health policies and their impact on national sovereignty.
WATCH:
Speakers at the event included Molecular Pathology Professor Masayasu Inoue and modern History Researcher Chikatsu Hayashi, who both expressed strong opposition to the WHO, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the prevailing medical strategies concerning COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Inoue and Hayashi’s speeches highlighted the perceived encroachments of global health authorities in partnership with pharmaceutical companies, and the potential dangers of genetic vaccines.
Professor Masayasu Inoue highlighted the concerning trend of health being weaponized in what he termed as “a third world war fought with information.” He urged the public to resist introducing genetic vaccines into their bodies, pointing out that a significant portion of WHO’s funding comes from pharmaceutical giants and private interests like the Bill Gates Foundation.
“My message for today is about vaccines that use our genetics to make our bodies produce pathogens or proteins, even if they’re disguised as vaccines, for example, next could be influenza,” Inoue told the crowd. “To everyone here, among friends and acquaintances, introducing genetic vaccines into the body should not be done, regardless of the type. Take this as the key message home; by doing so, I hope you can protect your children and grandchildren.”
Professor Inoue, in his address, articulated a stark vision of the current global health scenario: “Our health is being used as a weapon, and now we’re in the midst of a third world war fought with information, questioning whether responsible adults are aware and able to protect themselves accordingly,” he said. He further warned against the introduction of genetic vaccines which utilize the body’s mechanisms to produce agents that could potentially harm rather than heal.
Adding to the discourse, History Researcher Chikatsu Hayashi called for resistance against what he termed global totalitarian tendencies encompassed in the WHO’s plans, including the pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR). “We stand against WHO, global totalitarianism, pandemic treaties, submarine IHR, genetic vaccines, plandemic, control of information, and declare to eliminate all these,” Hayashi stated.
Chikatsu Hayashi continued, “Let’s stop the third atomic bomb with our hands, in the hands of the Japanese people. Shall we not? We stand against WHO, global totalitarianism, pandemic treaties, submarine IHR, genetic vaccines, plandemic, control of information, and declare to eliminate all these. Figures such as Tedros, Gates, Schwab, Biden, representatives of the New World Order.”
The demonstration also served as a platform to critique the sharp rise in unexplained excess deaths and demand transparency and accountability from health authorities about vaccine-related injuries and deaths. This sentiment was particularly poignant in light of the WHO and various world leaders calling for a swift agreement on a multilateral pandemic preparedness and prevention plan, which critics argue lacks sufficient transparency and inclusivity.
The protestors’ grievances are echoed in a broader context of international resistance, with countries like Iran, New Zealand, Slovakia, and the Netherlands recently rejecting proposed IHR amendments. In South Africa, a “WHO Withdrawal Bill” has also been proposed, signaling significant global apprehension about the directions of international health governance under the WHO’s current trajectory.