by 
By Ethan Huff
On May 18, 2020, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, a journal of the American Cancer Society (ACS), published a bizarre “science” paper lamenting the vainly imaginative myth that treating cancer in the United States is somehow contributing to man-made global warming. It has been a little more than three years since that study was published, and strangely, the United States is now suffering from a shortage of cancer treatment pharmaceuticals.
According to the ACS in 2020, the “carbon footprint of cancer care” has become so large that trying to rid patients of the disease threatens to accelerate man-made climate change. Now in 2023, either predictively or by design, there is a mysterious lack of the usual drug-based tools that cancer clinicians use to treat patients, and that some of them were previously complaining are damaging the environment.
Is all of this just one big strange coincidence, or was the plan all along to blame modern medicine for planetary warming while simultaneously phasing out cancer care under the guise of there no longer being enough cancer drugs available to treat everyone?
Marc Morano of Climate Depot chimed in on the matter, noting that it is certainly strange, to say the least, that things like anesthesia and cancer drugs are suddenly in the crosshairs for elimination by the global warming crowd. With anesthesia, they are outright trying to ban certain types of it that supposedly impact the climate the worst, but with cancer drugs, there are all of a sudden, not enough of them making it into cancer clinics.
(Related: The globalists that run the United Kingdom want to shut down all air travel, meat eating, and new construction, also under the guise of reducing the empire’s carbon footprint.)
Guess who benefits the most from America’s cancer drug shortage? Communist China
The Lancet recently published a study about the cancer drug shortage and how it affected cancer care. Chemotherapy drugs, in particular, are in short supply in the United States, reaching three-decade lows to the point that experts are now calling it a “crisis point.”
As many as 100,000 patients, we are told, no longer have access to chemotherapy drugs like they once did. And media outlets like Politico and PBS News are warning that both doctors and patients are increasingly having to make tough choices about what to do as an alternative.
The story goes that hospitals and cancer centers across the country are running out of two major injectable cancer drugs: carboplatin and cisplatin. Politico, meanwhile, is just about celebrating these shortages by running headlines that state: “Can Hospitals Turn Into Climate Change Fighting Machines? Inside the greening of American health care.”
Since “green” is typically code for anti-human, we can only assume that what they mean by the “greening” of health care is that patients will be left with increasingly fewer treatment options. More of them will end up dying as a result, which will “green” the planet further by leaving fewer people alive.
There is also a power shift happening as well, thanks to the new allowances by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the importation of cancer drugs from communist China, which increasingly produces drugs for America. In other words, another American industry is being outsourced to one of the country’s biggest political enemies.
All of this seems to be aimed at further weakening America’s economic status while bolstering that of communist China. And it is all being done under the guise of fighting man-made climate change, which is not even real in the first place.
No, carbon dioxide is NOT a pollutant and it DOESN’T control the planet’s temperatures
Ethan Huff
The Light, an “uncensored truth” magazine based out of the United Kingdom, published a powerful exposé this month all about the alleged climate crisis, which its editors say does not exist.
Entitled “No climate crisis: carbon dioxide has zero effect on temperatures,” the piece blows to bits the myth that carbon dioxide, a natural substance that all plants need in order to produce oxygen so we can breathe, has absolutely nothing to do with planetary temperatures.
Using two graphs and less than 300 words, the front-page story demolishes the climate hoax, exposing it as a sinister tool for stripping humans of their basic freedoms, including the right to work, travel and access public places.
Under the guise of promoting “ecological responsibility,” the globalists and their roving bands of climate fanatics aim to shift the world away from freedom and tradition into the tyrannical hands of corporate greed and control.
“The climate hoax is an attack on farming and food production – documentaries bemoan the methane production of cows, while the growth and transportation of soya beans destroys rainforests and requires an immense amount of water,” the article states.
“In terms of CO2, little is done to prevent celebrities and world leaders from flying in private jets from London to Inverness, while we must cycle to work, turn off the lights and eat bugs, while none of it makes any difference …”
(Related: One of the co-founders of Greenpeace is on record as confirming that carbon dioxide is the building block of all life on earth, which used to be taught as a basic science concept in grade school before the climate cult gutted education and turned it into a propaganda factory.)
COVID protocols like single-use masks, gloves and tests massively polluted the world
The article includes two graphs illustrating that even as CO2 levels have risen, air temperatures have remained roughly the same or even decreased at different points throughout recent history.
Over the past several thousand years, in fact, temperatures have been on an over decline, which is why back in the 1970s the corporate media was warning about global cooling. Since then, they shifted to a warming narrative followed by a general climate change narrative that encompasses it all.
During the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), there was a lot of talk about implementing a “new normal” that dovetailed with the goals of the climate brigade. They took the opportunity to use the “pandemic” as an excuse to push for massive changes in support of the climate, even as they forced the world to use highly polluting things like single-use masks, gloves and tests.
“Post-pandemic, it was said that animals returned to towns and air quality improved,” the article explains. “This was not the case, and also the recent push for reusable plastics was ignored, as single-use plastic COVID tests, gloves and masks were produced and used by the billions, while again making no difference.”
“The idea that we are helping the Earth by staying inside and complicit is pushing the public to accept that, in order to save the world we love so much, we must completely sacrifice our freedom.”
The article is really eye-opening and worth a read, as is the entire 23-page June issue of The Light.
“It’s really a simple hoax,” one commenter wrote about the myth of climate change. “The UN set up the IPCC to find evidence of man-made climate warming – not to investigate if it is actually occurring, but rather to procure anything suggesting that it does without question.”